What are the three components of the disturbance resolution model?

What are the three components of the disturbance resolution model?

• A. Approach Considerations; Intervention Options; Follow Through Considerations
• B. Approach; Intervention; Follow Up
• C. Disturbance Identification; Resolution Tactics; Aftercare
• D. Assessment; Planning; Execution

Answer: (A)

Handling disturbances effectively relies on a structured approach that covers how you approach the scene, the options you have to intervene, and what you do after the intervention to ensure safety and resolution. The best set of components names the first phase as Approach Considerations. This is about planning before you engage: evaluating the scene, risks, and dynamics, determining how you and your partner will position yourselves, what you will say, and how you will communicate with everyone involved. It sets the safety tone and informs which tactics may be appropriate. The second phase is Intervention Options. Here you consider a range of tactics and tools appropriate to the situation, starting with de-escalation and verbal commands, then using physically proportional measures only as needed, and selecting interventions that fit the risks and goals of the encounter. The idea is to use the minimum necessary force and to adapt in real time based on how the disturbance unfolds. The third phase is Follow Through Considerations. After the immediate risk is managed, you focus on ensuring long-term safety and proper closure: medical or welfare checks if needed, documentation and reporting, coordinating with supervisors, and arranging referrals or handoffs to other services. It also includes post-incident evaluation and any follow-up actions to prevent recurrence or address underlying issues. These three components fit together because they provide a complete pathway from planning to action to aftercare, ensuring safety, accountability, and learning. The other options either modify the terminology in a way that doesn’t align with the standard framework, or replace essential elements with different labels that don’t capture the full sequence of pre-engagement planning, in-situation intervention, and post-incident follow-through.

Handling disturbances effectively relies on a structured approach that covers how you approach the scene, the options you have to intervene, and what you do after the intervention to ensure safety and resolution. The best set of components names the first phase as Approach Considerations. This is about planning before you engage: evaluating the scene, risks, and dynamics, determining how you and your partner will position yourselves, what you will say, and how you will communicate with everyone involved. It sets the safety tone and informs which tactics may be appropriate.

The second phase is Intervention Options. Here you consider a range of tactics and tools appropriate to the situation, starting with de-escalation and verbal commands, then using physically proportional measures only as needed, and selecting interventions that fit the risks and goals of the encounter. The idea is to use the minimum necessary force and to adapt in real time based on how the disturbance unfolds.

The third phase is Follow Through Considerations. After the immediate risk is managed, you focus on ensuring long-term safety and proper closure: medical or welfare checks if needed, documentation and reporting, coordinating with supervisors, and arranging referrals or handoffs to other services. It also includes post-incident evaluation and any follow-up actions to prevent recurrence or address underlying issues.

These three components fit together because they provide a complete pathway from planning to action to aftercare, ensuring safety, accountability, and learning. The other options either modify the terminology in a way that doesn’t align with the standard framework, or replace essential elements with different labels that don’t capture the full sequence of pre-engagement planning, in-situation intervention, and post-incident follow-through.